But I have to make a lot more tests to get some conclusive results. I actually had to make several adjustments to the sliders just to get it to look even *this* good (whereas, again, Faceware looks better out of the box with no adjustments). What I find is that Faceware seems smoother, while Faceshift seems more squirrely. I'm hoping this is CC3, and that's what we'll be getting and, if so, I'm hoping it means that the Faceshift thingee works better with it (but then again, shouldn't Faceware work better, too?) The sample recording in that tutorial sure looks better than what I could get with Zane, though.
The one wild card to all this is I'm using Zane to test, and the sample tutorial RL posted uses a completely new character which APPEARS to be better detailed. Perhaps I just need some more adjustments here, but I kind of doubt it. Edit: I'm now on the fence whether this is better than Faceware or not. So I bought the iPhone X plugin (could never get the demo to install but even if I had it wouldn't have been much use to evaluate it, as you have to record *something* to test - really weird of RL to make a timed, 30 day demo that doesn't do anything, as either you should be able to record *something* or it shouldn't be timed).
0 kommentar(er)
